Some of the biggest winners and losers from Tuesday’s primary elections didn’t get any votes. In fact, many of them weren’t even on the ballot.
These political players include the behind-the-scenes operatives who played key roles in orchestrating victories and the politicians who put skin in the game and came out looking better for the effort. Other pols didn’t fare so well — they showed flawed judgment, bet on the wrong candidates or saw their political fortunes take a turn for the worse.
U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire represented my family and an overwhelming number of his other constituents recently by voting "no" on the health care reform bill.
As a small-business owner who covers 100 percent of the health insurance premiums for my employees, I agree with Mr. Altmire that we need real reform that would bring down the cost of health care. Unfortunately the new health care reform law neither improves the quality of care nor reduces the costs. Instead it piles on additional costs and taxes that take effect immediately.
Regardless of your political persuasion, the best you can hope for is that your congressman votes according to his constituents and not blindly with his party leadership. Mr. Altmire kept that very promise the first time around and again with this vote.
JOHN T. BOYD II
President and CEO
John T. Boyd Company
Canonsburg
The writer lives in Wexford.
My apologies to you, Congressman Altmire. When you voted against the proposed health care plans in 2009, because of their fiscal shortfalls, I thought it was just a “party wink” because Congress had enough votes already pledged. But your “listening to your constituents” and “caring for fiscal and social impacts on them” appears to be quite genuine as evidenced in your vote on the Senate health care plan.
You will undoubtedly be penalized in Washington for not towing the party line. But, you were elected to serve and protect your constituents and we need more of our representatives to follow your example.
I agreed with you that the idea of universal healthcare has many appealing virtues and that the Senate bill had both good and disappointing points. But, you voted with the best interest of your constituents as your “#1 concern” versus following what party leaders demanded of you. Thank for you acting like our representative, which you are. My hope is that we can get more members from both parties to do this same “listening to their constituents” at all levels of government.
I extend this letter not on
behalf of the municipality, but rather all like-minded constituents in the
municipality. Robert J. Brooks, Murrysville
Published in the Penn Franklin
April 2, 2010
Many of us feel U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire deserves a lot of credit for standing by his convictions and the "no" vote he cast on the health care package.
Altmire was under tremendous pressure from both sides of the issue, including several meetings with President Barack Obama at the White House and House Speaker House Nancy Pelosi, to vote in the affirmative.
In addition, his office received thousands of phone calls to try and influence his decision.
At the end of the day, after a thorough review of the language contained in the bill and other factors, the congressman said he cast the "no" vote because overwhelmingly, the people from his district strongly opposed this legislation.
Altmire did not cave in under pressure from other politicians or political action committees but rather did the right thing and voted for what is best for the people he represents.
Believe me, that takes a huge amount courage.
Dan Donatella
Industry
Editor's note: The writer is the former chairman of the Beaver County Board of Commissioners (retired).
We are writing to express our most sincere appreciation to U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire for his courageous vote on behalf of Lawrence County and the majority of his constituents.
In the face of unimaginable pressure, Rep. Altmire stood firm for his district and voted against a health care reform bill that passes off some of its costs to the already overstrapped states and includes sizable cuts in Medicare, the insurance program for a large portion of Lawrence County's residents.
Rep. Altmire has never let partisanship come ahead of what is best for his district, and we in Lawrence County again thank him for standing up for us.
STEVE CRAIG
RICHARD DeBLASIO
DAN VOGLER
Lawrence County Commissioners
New Castle
The public debate leading up to the House vote Sunday night on health care was long, intense and often trying. However, through the entire process Rep. Jason Altmire consistently demonstrated an open mind and a willingness to listen to his constituents. He thoughtfully engaged in discussions on the pros and cons of the many aspects of the bill. He clearly sought the best possible outcome, based on what those he represents were telling him.
While emotions are strong on both sides of this issue, in the long run everyone would be better served if we had more people in Congress like Jason Altmire.
JERRY VEST
Fox Chapel
In your "Vote of Weakness" editorial (March 22), you failed to mention one other critical group with whom Rep. Jason Altmire stood -- the people he represents. While this may be surprising to partisans, Mr. Altmire's obligations are to represent the will of his constituents, not his party, the president or some ethereal notion of the historical moment.
Given that his district voted for President Bush in 2000 and 2004 and gave Sen. John McCain an 11-point margin over President Obama in 2008, it's hard to fathom how any thoughtful person could attempt to argue that Rep. Altmire's vote against the health care bill was anything other than the proper vote for his district -- regardless of how that person viewed the merits of the legislation.
Perhaps partisans are quick to forget that in 2006 the Democratic National Committee recruited candidates whose philosophies more closely mirrored their districts than the traditional Democratic Party denizen, understanding that because of that philosophy these Democrats would not vote in lock-step with the party on matters that were important to their districts.
In arguing that Rep. Altmire was a coward, the editorial board and those who argue in kind demonstrate either a wanton disregard of the duties of a representative or a convenient forgetfulness of the circumstances surrounding Rep. Altmire's election and the district he represents. If it's deemed reasonable to label a congressman who represents his district a coward, we truly have descended into a sorry time in our politics and our discourse.
From partisans, it is to be expected. From the Post-Gazette, we expect more.
RON VASSEL
Sewickley
I am a conservative Republican who usually votes a straight Republican ticket.
Lately, I have been somewhat impressed with U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire's voting record. I feel that he is one politician who truly cares.
On Tuesday, I watched as the 53 orphans from Haiti were brought to Pittsburgh. I was very moved by the effort given to this operation by the many people involved.
Not the least was the effort by Altmire, who contacted the White House and the State Department and cleared the way for this wonderful humanitarian operation to succeed. My congratulations go out to Altmire and all involved, including Gov. Ed Rendell.
Altmire can depend on this Republican's vote from this point on.
Charles Matthews
Independence Township
Last year, congressional Democratic leaders scheduled very few votes on controversial social issues that might split their party. One view is that the leaders avoided such hot-button subjects because they didn't want to force Democrats in GOP-leaning districts to make tough votes -- and potentially risk the party's majority in the process. Altmire has a different theory. "The reason, in my opinion, they didn't have those votes is because they wouldn't have won them," he said.
A case in point was a 2008 bill that Altmire co-sponsored, backed by the National Rifle Association, to overturn the District of Columbia's gun control laws. The House passed the bill 260-160, with 82 Democrats and 178 Republicans forming the winning coalition. Altmire believes that his position would prevail this year too, even with fewer Republicans in Congress. "I would expect guns and immigration still would favor the conservative side," he said.
Last year, House Democratic leaders could afford to lose only 18 of their rank-and-file members and still win votes without any Republican support. And the leaders did lose at times: Of the key votes used in the 2008 ratings, Republicans defeated a majority of Democrats by swaying Democratic centrists on such issues as business regulation, national security, gun control, and fiscal discipline. But after picking up 21 additional seats in November, House Democratic leaders have shown a willingness to press for more-liberal legislation, starting with the stimulus package.
Moderate Democrats worry that their leaders and the White House may push too far to the left this year. "As long as 39 of us are cohesive and hold firm, the Democratic leadership will have to work with us to mollify our concerns to ensure they have the votes to pass legislation," said Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, D-S.D., co-chair of the 49-member Blue Dog Coalition of moderate House Democrats. She was the 15th-most-conservative House Democrat in the 2008 ratings.
Herseth Sandlin said that moderate Democrats want to see legislation developed with their input from start to finish through the regular committee process, rather than just at the end after liberal leaders have negotiated bills behind closed doors. "Even if we're uncomfortable with certain elements in the final package, we will have had that opportunity to influence the legislation in a way that makes sense for our constituents and makes sense for our principles," she said.
In the Senate, the support of moderate Democrats is crucial to Obama and Democratic leaders because their party is two votes short of the 60-vote threshold needed to break filibusters. Those numbers give the chamber's moderate Democrats even more negotiating power than their House counterparts.
In the key votes used in the 2008 ratings, Senate Democratic centrists occasionally voted against their leaders, including these three outliers, who ranked as the first-, second-, and third-most-conservative Democrats, respectively, in their chamber.
• Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., whose concerns over fiscal discipline resulted in his being the only Democrat to vote against the majority's budget resolution -- usually a test of party loyalty.
• Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., who was among a handful of Democrats to oppose a measure in March expanding social safety net programs by raising taxes on millionaires. "I am a fiscal conservative," he said. "I am very concerned about spending."
• Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., whose increasingly Republican home state is an oil and gas producer, leading her to endorse conservative positions on energy legislation in particular.
Although fiscal discipline is a key sticking point for moderate Senate Democrats, their opposition could kill legislation on issues ranging from abortion rights to immigration reform. Nelson, for example, advocated less spending on school construction in this year's stimulus package because of conservative-style worries about local control of education. "I'm philosophically concerned about having the federal government having much more to do with K-12 education," he said.
Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, a second-term member whose vote ratings were liberal on social and foreign policy but moderate on economic issues, recently formed a Populist Caucus aimed at developing policy positions that Democrats of all stripes can agree on. "There isn't really a lot of disagreement on some of these core economic middle-class values," Braley said, pointing to such issues as middle-class tax cuts, affordable health care, and consumer protection.
But Braley acknowledged that ideological differences will pose a challenge as he and others seek to build winning coalitions in this Congress. "The great thing about Democrats is, sometimes we agree to disagree," he said.
-National Journal Magazine
The first time they met, two years ago, Jason Altmire nipped incumbent Republican Melissa Hart in a tight race.
Last night, Mr. Altmire was riding a wave of nationwide Democratic gains, but this time with the benefit of incumbency and superior funding.
-- Post Gazette
This year’s race for Congress in the 4th District is like deja vu all over again.
Upstart Democrat Jason Altmire ousted Republican Melissa Hart from Congress in a political shocker two years ago.
U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire and challenger Melissa Hart argued yesterday over Social Security, a potent issue in the senior-rich 4th Congressional District.
Murrysville police cars are getting an upgrade
NEW CASTLE, Pa. — Lawrence County received $1.25 million for two projects meant to bring in businesses and jobs.
Local senior citizens got an up-close look at two new Medicare provisions authored by U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire, Pa.-4, when he visited Plum Senior Community Center this month.
Some college interns will get school credits for their jobs, under legislation that is expected to be signed by President Bush next week.
A bill empowering Congress to act on recommendations by the U.S. International Trade Commission against unfair trade practices has gotten the support of officials at Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp.
A local legislator wants to help small business owners get a piece of the federal contracting pie.